Hi,
As I have filled up the details now I click on save button then it shows the dump Run time Errors ASSERTION FAILED for the cases except consumer,payer,business partner,contract partner .So please help me out .I will be very thankful for your answers.
Regards
Avanish
Hi Team,
I wanted to use EA29 for mass printing, but while schedule the mass process there is no option of giving printing based on Posting dare(BUDAT in ERDK)
Can I have the selection based on posting date(BUDAT) while running EA29 .
Regards,
Pankaj
Hello Experts,
I created a custom variant ZVAR1(say) that takes FLAG as input operand and INTEGER type as Output operand.
This output operand holds integer values(for month difference) that is used by next std variant (INFACT08) in the schema.
My custom variant ZVAR1 should NOT write to the install facts. The next variant writesto the installation facts(using MAC_FACTS_WRITE).
What macro should i use here? I tried mac_output_ioper x_op-o1 but its not working.
In the rate config(EA32), i am seeing that my variant gets called first followed by std variant INFACT08. In debug mode inside the std variant INFACT08 code, i am seeing some values filled up in XY_OBJ & X_OP-O1 structures. i am NOT able to see the value of my output operand coming from the previous variant(ZVAR1).
Can someone tell me what is wrong? Thanks Ricky
Hi All,
Hope you all fine and doing great.
I have a requirement where in i have to add few fields at Point Of Delivery ID screen of transaction EEDM10. Is there any BADI or EXIT to add this. I have searched for the related enhancement but i didn't find any specific to the requirement. Kindly help me find the solution for this. Attached is the screen shot which shows where exactly i need to add the fields.
Thanks and Regards,
Mohammed Farooq
Dear Experts,
We would like to know the advantages of implementing SAP MFU over SAP UCES.
Can someone draw the comparisons based on the offerings by the two services.
Surely, we want something that should be device independent (can run on desktop/tablet/mobile) , an emerging solution and on which SAP will continue to invest as new developments/enhancements/refinements etc.
I've gone through a lot of blogs that explain / outline SAP MFU as SAP's new strategy to help utilities implement modern customer engagement applications.
But before coming to any conclusion, we would like to hear from the experts 
BR,
Anurag
Hello,
I have one question.
What is main purpose MR documet status 3 - blocked by agent.
it is only one way how to achive through EL27,28,29 using RESET button. this button set status 3.
Is there any function for processing this status.
thanks for explanation
Boris Orlický
Dear Experts,
We would like to know if we can use Java UME as user management for SAP Netweaver Gateway.
In our landscape, we are also planning to implement UCES for which Java UME (Portal UME) is planned to be configured.
Now, we are also planning to implement Mobile services for Utilities end customers for which we intend to follow SAP Netweaver Gateway approach.
Now, as these are 2 different set of development approaches and as we would like to have one common User Management approach for both the types of developments, could you please comment on the feasibility of using Java UME as user management for NW GW approach.
Thanks & Regards,
Anurag Gwari
Hi,
While creating print document via EA60 system is indicating that Print document 60000XXXXX printed successfully but showing error as "error in reading table ECHANGE_SERVICE". Kindly suggest possible reasons. Our system is recently updated with EHP7 for SAP ERP 6.0.
Regards
Girish Bahuguna
Hi Amian,
Happy new year!
I found you had discussed payment card process here , I wonder can we process encrypted Credit card number into SAP directly when get confirmation from Card issue company?
thanks !
Mary
Hi All,
In our EHP6 env we are using '03 - Quantity Determination during Meter Reading' functionality for gas division.
We have configured thermal gas billing and for this following have been created:
a) Volume Correction Factor - This is created with 02 thermal gas billing factor (inclusive of temperature and pressure).
VCF is to be calculated based on daily weighted averages of temperature and pressure.
For this:
1) Temperature area is defined and values are defined in TE448 table.
2) Weighting Key (Degree Day) is defined and values are maintained in TE107 table.
3) Gas Pressure Determination checkbox is ticked so that gas pressure is determined via Gas Pressure Area defined.
4) Air Pressure Ares is defined and daily air pressure area values are maintained.
5) Temperature and Pressure extra fields are selected.
6) No Special VCF procedure checkbox is selected so that standard controls defined in VCF procedure are followed.
b) Calorific Value Procedure - Calorific value district is defined and daily values are maintained in TE450 table.
CVP is defined to calculate arithmetic mean of daily values stored in TE450 table.
When actual meter read is entered via EL28 tcode, error - "Gas Factor ITHG cannot be defined uniquely" is returned and no expected MR is calculated.
I believe this error is caused due to the new quantity determination procedure - 03 (introduced in EHP6) defined in customising where gas consumption (in MJ) has to be calculated on save of meter read.
On debugging this issue further we found that there is issue in calculating the gas factor and internal table yt_ithg (SAP program - SAPLEA50, Include - LEA50F02) contains more than one entry. SAP only expects one entry with gas factor calculated.
Can you please let me know if anyone else has encountered this error or is there an issue in our VCF procedure defined?
Thanks,
Mayur
Hi,
I am working with Device Info Records (EG44 Transaction) and I have got the below issue. Can someone please provide some help on this?
Scenario:
1.I have installed the Device Info Record to Installation say from 01.01.2014.
2. Now I have received a request where I have to modify the Register Group for DIR from 15.12.2014 and configuration needs to be changed from Real Time Pricing Device to Non Real Time Pricing Device.
3. So, when I try to perform DIR modification by EG41, it gives me the error "Rate data is no longer consistent".
4 If I try to change the Rate Data first EG70, it doesn't allow me to change the Rate Type as the device still belongs to Real Time Pricing; So Non Real time pricing Rate Type is not allowed.
So till the time the Device Info Record is installed, I cannot change either of the values (Rate Type & Interval Length on Register).
Then I thought of Process as
1. Remove DIR
2. Amend DIR with new value of Register Group
3. Re-Install DIR with New Rate Type
But the problem is once I remove the DIR, it does not open in EG41 as editable. There is an error message "Device is not valid from 15.12.2014 to 15.12.2014 (Message EG065)".
In Short, both the approaches are not working for me right now. Can you please help me with your thoughts, how to handle such situation?
Thanks
Rishi
Hello Experts,
During testing face in sand box,payment lot ( FP05 ) fails with status "Posting incomplete",then I went for post processing and found an error "Unable to determine an interim account for item 000001",See attachment also.
Could you please help me out from this error.
Regards
Amit
Hi everyone !!!
I have one question regarding ISU RTP billing.
As o/p parameters are getting generated at runtime while running RTP interface.
As per our requirement we need to print these o/p parameters what is the best possible way to do it ?
We also want to link bill document no with generated o/p parameter profiles also.
Thanks in advance !!
Hi,
Could anyone explain the advantages of having a factory calendar in SAP for Utilities.
Is there a provision while setting up batch jobs where i could still schedule my jobs on public holidays.
Hello.
We are traying to implement the fuctionality of Areas of Responsibility for the Cash Journal in Contract Accounts (FI-CA). We are facing an issue which is that with transaction FQ_FPCJ_SC_462 the system links the rol of cashier to the rule of the rule of Cashier with special tasks (22000003) instead of linking it to the rule of Cashier (22000005).
Do you know where can we correct the wrong linking?
Thanks and regards,
J. Rebollar and Isela Ramírez.
Hi experts,
Is it the standard behaviour to have to choose the object type (between FI-CA Document and Utility document) whenever you use GOS for documents in FICA?
The even display the same number in the object name which doesnt make sense to me, is there any way to restrict it?
Thanks,
Mario
All, There is a issue and I am looking for inputs to solve the same. Any pointers will be appreciated.
The problem goes like: There is one installation and the billing block was applied on it and till now it was never billed as the client didn't want to bill this BP. Now the move out is done for the current BP, new BP is moved-in in installation and Final billing order is created for the previous contract. However, the client wants to bill the new BP and system is not allowing due to previous final billing order. Is there anyway, the new BP can be billed in installation without billing the previous BP. Thanks in advance.
Hi Experts,
We are upgrading the CRM ISU system for EHP1 to EHP3 in ISU. After upgrade while I confirm the BP and click on create new contract(Move IN) I am getting the error as bleow:
"Error retrieving process IUMI"
"Error New Contracts process is not permitted".
Anybody is having any idea on this please update.
BR
Chinmaya Parida
Hello experts,
Payment program ( FPY1 ) creates ACH files in addition with idoc,A user want to create the ACH file and want to put this file in specific directory in server ( AL11 ),for all this user run some job in background,but this job is failing and he is getting dump ( st22 ) "No authorization to open the file /usr/sap/data/asp/Ach001".
So what I think. this is authorization issue for user,meanwhile I compare the role assignment for this user with the user who is able to perform the above task successfully,but all role assignment are same in SU01.
Could you help me what I can do next ?
Regards
Amit
Hi export ,
Can anyone advise me how to handle the bank incoming file transfer to FICA payment lot?
I tried to ran T-code FPB7 but there is always show no data . does anyone figer out what kind of data should input for " ID"
