Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Unanswered Discussions - SAP for Utilities
Viewing all 1891 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

BAPI_MTRREADDOC_UPLOAD - AKTIV not updated correctly

August 14, 2015, 2:54 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We are uploading meter reads through the BAPI 'BAPI_MTRREADDOC_UPLOAD'.

We are passing the meter reads in 'meterreadingresults', as we want to insert the new reads.

 

The reads are getting created correctly.

But,

 

  We are setting the active flag (AKTIV) along with the other fields before calling the BAPI, as follows

          .....

          wa_meter_reading-active = 0

          (wa_meter_reading is a structure of type bapieablu)

          .....

          APPEND wa_meter_reading to i_meter_reading.

 

   The internal table 'i_meter_reading' is the one we are passing to the BAPI.

   

    For some reason, the EABL-AKTIV is always set to 1.

 

Can anyone let us know why this is happening:

1. Is it because BAPIEABLU-ACTIVE is not linked to EABL-AKTIV?

    If so what is the field to be used/?

 

2. Is is because some exit is changing the active status?

    What are the possible exits called when the aforementioned BAPI is called?

 

3. Is there any other reason why this is happening.

 

Your inputs will be much appreciated.

 

Thanks.

↧
Search

Scalar Non-Billable MRO already loaded. Installation xxxxxx

August 14, 2015, 2:13 pm
$
0
0

hi,

I load interval data to create the billing order.  The idoc in 51 status and the error message is as above.

 

Does anyone know how to fix it?

↧
↧

List of New Business Partners

August 17, 2015, 2:59 pm
$
0
0

Is there any standard report available to provide a list of newly created Business Partners during a specified period?

 

Thanks for all your help!

↧

Waivers for Low Income group ?

August 18, 2015, 3:23 pm
$
0
0

We have a business requirement where we want to waive off certain fees for low income customers.

The type of fees that will be waived off are as under:

1.Check return fees

2.Disconnection & reconnection fees

 

As i don't see a standard field to identify low income group in BP or Contract account , i guess we will have to add custom field to one of these objects.

 

My queries are as under:

1. Is my understanding correct with reference to non availability of standard fields for marking customer as belonging to low income group ?

2. Which is the preferable object to modify BP or CA ?

3. Has anyone implemented something similar & can share their experiences.

 

Any advice is appreciated.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Satish

↧

Configuration value not found for parameter POC_ACTIVE, enter a valid value

August 19, 2015, 7:13 am
$
0
0

Dears Experts,

 

When entering the EAN code in tcode CIC0, instead of having master data from the system,

 

I get the following error message: Configuration value not found for parameter POC_ACTIVE, enter a valid value

 

Looking on the net I could find to much info the topic.

 

Can any help with an idea ?

 

Thanks in advance,

 

thierno

↧
↧

Wrong BP Category Created during Master Data Creation in ISU - CS

August 19, 2015, 9:16 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

During data migration for Business Partner in SAP ISU - CS, in few cases the BP type was created as Person while it was actually organization and vice - versa. After around 8 months such discrepancy is found. Multiples bills and invoices have been made.

Is there any way to correct this.If Not what is the implication of this wrong BP category.

 

The Business Partners were created in ECC SAP ISU - CS through Master Data Templates using EMIGALL. This was done during data migration form legacy system.

 

However, in few cases, due to non clarity in legacy system data, the BP type was selected as Organization which was actually Person and vice - versa. Now can it be corrected ? If Not, what is the implication of wrong BP type and any workaround to handle this.

↧

Error importing CONNOBJ migration object using EMIGALL, Label ## is already being use in labeling system ##

August 20, 2015, 4:10 am
$
0
0

Hi everyone,

 

I have a problem when importing CONNOBJ migration object using EMIGALL (IS-U Migration Workbench). I configured all needed fields and did several imports already, which did everything needed and as expected.

 

Due to other business needs, I activate alternative labeling for functional locations because I need maximum lenght of 40 for them.

I implement SAP note 1163742 to enable use of alternative labeling in IS-U.

Since then, Im unable to do a successful import of CONNOBJ migration object using EMIGALL. The error Im getting is: Functional location ## already exists.

 

I tried doing following:

  • I reseted functional location number range in transaction EN03 – this didnt help. After doing this, I get another error: Label ## is already being use in labeling system ##.
  • As mentioned above I implemented note 1163742 (it helps IS-U support the alternative labeling) – it didnt help
  • I implemented note 1344684 (it help showing the correct migration objects CONNOBJ and DEVLOC) – it didnt help
  • I implemented note 702373 (to delete invalid records in IFLOS table) – it didnt help

 

When I try to create connection object via transaction ES55, the connection object gets created without an error. This is why I think the problem is somewhere in EMIGALL procedures.


I also analize SAP note 687105, but our system version is 617 and solution from that note is already implemented.

 

Has anyone ran into similar problem or knows what should I do to continue with import?


Thanks in advance.

↧

BRF - Can we trigger multiple actions (truth tables) via the event in BRF

August 20, 2015, 1:40 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We have an issue in BRF with the number of columns in the truth tables max 32 columns used, we have more expressions because of the business rules which needs to be accommodated in the columns of the . Due to this are are plan to split the current truth table into two by using the expression in the event which triggers the action.

However for some reason the truth table is not getting triggered. Has someone implemented such kind of scenario, triggering two actions from the same event?

Screenshot.jpg

↧
Search

Multi-channel foundation for Utilities - roadmap (SP05 and beyond)

August 21, 2015, 6:19 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We're considering implementing MCF for Utilities in Q1 next year. I have all the info on MCF 1.0 and 2.0, up to SP04 which was released Q1 2015. I found 1 slide with a reference to a SP05 to be released Q3 2015, but no details.

 

Does anyone have a roadmap for SP05 and beyond? I didn't find any information in the solution roadmap for Utilities neither...

 

Thanks!

↧
↧

Security Deposit Partial Release/Interest Calcualtion

August 23, 2015, 6:57 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I'm new to SAP FICA.

 

I have few quires regarding Security Deposit Partial Release/Interest calculation.

 

1. When a Security Deposit is partially released, system shows the partial release date with respective to Security Deposit start date.

    Is this the standard behavior, or else is there any other way to check partial release date of Security Deposit.

     Example:

     Security Deposit start date = 01.01.2014

     Security Deposit Partial release date (happens on 16.09.2014) = 01.01.2014 (system populated Security Deposit start date)

 

2. In the event of partial release of Security Deposit, is there a feasibility to calculate the interest on Security Deposit at this point of time.

    If so, is there a standard configuration or else it should be custom.

 

 

Thanks in Advance

 

Regards

Thaheer

↧

Dunning with Dunning Procedure on accounts with collection strategy data

August 25, 2015, 2:33 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

We are implementing collection strategy for our client. we have a requirement where contrant accounts will be migrated to collection strategy and after that in collection management Master Data Grouping level reset to Blank. Then our dunning should be performed through Classical dunning.

But it is not happening, it is performing a dunning through collection strategy though it is deactivated.

 

we have tried this for a single company code (by deactivating coll stra) but it gives error "Company codes with collection grouping can only be dunned in separate run" in FPVA. when we have investigated this, we found that this message comes from events 1795 based on the dunning mode 3.

 

We have one more query, if collection management is activated for any one company code then why collection strategy field get visible for all the contract accounts irrespective of their company codes?

 

Can you please help us to resolve this issue?

 

Thanks,

Harshal

↧

Long text in printworkbench

August 25, 2015, 6:55 am
$
0
0

Hi  ,

1)  Please let me know how to print long paragraph in  customer bill  through   bill print.

2)   How to tract Out of balances in bill print  when triggering through EA29

3)   Which   exit is to be  write  to send  all requires inf  to RDI file.

 

 

Thanks,

Sam

↧

FPY1 and ACH file generation

August 25, 2015, 9:09 am
$
0
0

We are in need to execute FPY1 and generate the outgoing file in ACH format.

 

The FPY1 is successful but I am running SAPFKPY3 to generate the file, it errors out saying "No payment medium created".

 

Our requirement is to generate plain ACH file. No smartform or sap script etc.

 

Any pointers on what am I missing?

 

Thanks

↧
↧

ISU_DET_DEVICE_FROM_INST error

August 25, 2015, 1:34 pm
$
0
0

I implemented ISU_DET_DEVICE_FROM_INST in the program to read all of the meters that are linked to the BP. The customer accounts coordinator wants to have the report to read all of the meters readings from the BP and from the old meters that have been changed out.

 

Error analysis

    An exception occurred that is explained in detail below.

    The exception, which is assigned to class 'CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_TYPE', was

     not caught in procedure "GRID_DISPLAY" "(FORM)", nor was it propagated by a RAISING clause.

    Since the caller of the procedure could not have anticipated that the

    exception would occur, the current program is terminated.

    The reason for the exception is:

    The call to the function module "ISU_DET_DEVICE_FROM_INST" is incorrect:

 

    The function module interface allows you to specify only

    fields of a particular type under "X_KEYDATE".

    The field "'01/01/1900'" specified here is a different

    field type

 

 

I used this in the program and after this it's been giving me errors. Thanks.

 

DATA: xy_lt_ger TYPE isu07_twd_gertab_t.

 

CALL FUNCTION 'ISU_DET_DEVICE_FROM_INST'

 

EXPORTING

x_anlage       = eastl-anlage

x_keydate      = '01/01/1900'

X_ONLY_KEYDATE = 'X'

CHANGING

xy_t_ger       = xy_lt_ger

 

EXCEPTIONS

not_found      = 1

internal_error = 2

system_error   = 3

OTHERS         = 4.

↧

WebService enabled external collection

August 31, 2015, 6:20 am
$
0
0

Hi gurus,

 

In an scenario with WebService enabled external collection, is it possible to receive information about the current actions taken by the external agency to collect the debt? e.g. Called customer on 27 Aug, Visited customer on 29 Aug?

 

Thanks.

 

M

↧
Search

Outsorted invoice

September 3, 2015, 3:11 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

When we reverse a outsorted invoice  then at that time system deleted invoice no from all the the tables (like ERDK , ERDO , etc) as it do for simulated invoices.

My query is

 

can we know when and who reversed this invoice, if no then in that case is there is a way to get this information ?    

↧

Options for FPY1

September 3, 2015, 10:38 am
$
0
0

Presently we have two payment run for FPY1 i.e. payment method X to get document posted based on due date and another payment method y where customer has the option to pay before due date,   On top of that we have multiple currency/country for which we need to create different files . All this results into creation of 4 files,  2 file per payment method for 2 banks.


our requirement is to create only one file for two payment method so we bring down number of files from 4 to 2


I have considered below option, p


a) Do not run payment medium along with FPY1, but create custom program so that it can combine data for two payment method and populate in one single file.



is there way to have single payment run for two payment method x & y? 



Also Please let me know if there is any other solution for this or standard SAP approach to meet the requirement?

↧
↧

Move IN and Move Out

September 6, 2015, 11:09 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I have to perform MOVE-IN and MOVE-out at premise level. I have Old Owner and old contract account plus New owner and have  created new contract.

 

Is there any BAPI or API in which I can perform both task together. If not please provide what can be the best possible solution for following scenario usgin BAPI and which one? Also sample code for using suggested BAPI's..

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Regards

Vijju

↧

Activation of planned changes is not scheduled for object Contract Object

September 8, 2015, 11:29 am
$
0
0

Experts Hope you were all fine.... I'm doing Configuration of SLCM Financials in Education sector i have done base line of  FI-CA but when i check Contract Account settings in SPRO .....It show me Errors...(1.Activation of planned changes is not scheduled for object Contract Account

2.Activation of planned changes is not scheduled for object Contract Object)...Can any one Help me how i resolve these errors Because i cannot go for Further Configuration till I solve these Errors ....Kindly Share your Expertise  it would be really helpful for me...

 

Kind Regards

Faraz Sharif

↧

Unable to make new account registration in MCF Utilities application

September 9, 2015, 6:10 am
$
0
0

Hi Team,


We are working for Utility application and trying to create new Account by Email verification.But unable to login with newly created UserID as Email verification functionality is not working.

Kindly advice/suggest us to proceed further.

Steps followed for email verification :


 

 

Thanks & regards,

Sowmya

↧
Viewing all 1891 articles
Browse latest View live
Search