Hello Colleagues,
We are implementing BRF+ IS-U Collection Strategy Dunning.
Once we turn on the Business Function for Flexible Dunning and assign the Master Data Grouping level (e.g. at Contract Account level), can we revert back to the traditional Dunning Procedure-based Dunning?
If so, would it be a Basis task to turn off Flexible Dunning (in addition to blanking out the Master Data Grouping level at Company Code level)?
Your feedback would be appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Ivor Martin
HI,
I have a question on the DFKKSUM posting totals from FICA to FICO.
In our current scenario FICA to FICO summarization for BP line item level is happening on GL account. Is there any way that i can handle this ?
If this is possible can it be handled at config level or there any FICA events that i can use.
Thanks,
Raju.
Hi Experts,
Can you please tell me the process to create the credit note in ISU- Fica.
Thanks in advance.
Hi All,
Payment specification documents can be restricted to dun by standard?
Please Suggest.
Regards,
Hari
I remember using LSMW I can start a batch-load job with front-end processing using SM35, meaning I see all screens in a dialog process while pressing and then holding down the "Enter" key. So that I see all screens being processed in a batch load of data. Is there a way to start this mode in EMIGALL?
Hi all,
what is the best practice for installing MCF in combination with CRM and IS-U regarding data replication between both systems? If one for example wants to retrieve/change information about a business partner: Which system would be called? I am wondering if a deadlock/foreign lock situation could occur when MCF changes business objects simultaneously in both systems.
Has anyone experience with this kind of problems or best practices how to avoid it?
Many thanks in advance!
Kind regards
Hi all,
Apologies if this is has been asked before or really basic. Just looking for help/shortcuts with the dunning proposal.
I have used SAPs Dunning proposal to reconcile against my accounts and create a final spool manually before our statements/chasing documents are printed and sent.
I am currently running through each separate account in the proposal and manually dropping the level where applicable.
Is it possible to select multiple items in the dunning proposal in order to drop everything in batches (e.g. level 3s to 2s and then level 4s to 3s) rather than running through each line where a change is necessary, which over the course of all our ledgers is quite extensive?
Again if this has been answered previously could you point me in the right direction?
Cheers!
Hi,
We have a requirement where the 30 days payment terms for collective invoices should follow based on days of the week on which the child contract accounts are invoiced,
For example,
Contract Account 1 - Invoiced on 02/02/2016 (Week 1)
Contract Account 2 - Invoiced on 03/02/2016 (Week 1)
When collective invoicing is performed for the above Contract Accounts (linked to same Collective Contract Account), The collective invoice should take base line date as 07/02/2016 and add 30 days for Due Date.
Similarly, if the Child invoices are billed in different days of the weeks, when Collective invoicing is processed, it needs to pick up 7, 14, 21 & 28 as the fixed baseline date based on child invoices date and add 30 days as payment terms to arrive at due date.
Is it possible to create a Payment term which can be assigned at collective contract account to meet the above requirement?
If yes, can you please guide me on the parameters to be maintained in the payment terms creation?
Thanks,
-Murthy
Hi Guru's,
I have a requirement like, I am collecting energy charges and Non-energy charges but thing is client is asking to give the separate report for Energy and Non-energy charges. Can you please help me on this how to over come my solution.
Ex: The below items already adding in Invoice with Consumption amount.
| Line Item | Rs. |
| 1. Installation Charges | 100.00 |
| 2. Security Deposit Rs. | 1200.00 |
| 3. Supervision charge | 400.00 |
| 4. Cost of service line | 100.00 |
| 5. Estimation Charges | 200.00 |
| 6. Application Fee | 0.00 |
| 7. Meter Rent | 0.00 |
| 8. Meter Cost | 0.00 |
| 9. MCB/Cut out Charges | 0.00 |
| 10. Adv. Energy Charge | 0.00 |
| 11. Fix Charge | 0.00 |
| 12 | 0.00 |
| Meter and Service Removal | 0.00 |
| Charges/Any other charge, | 0.00 |
| if any | 0.00 |
| 13. Meter Testing Charges Rs. 0.00 | 0.00 |
Thanks,
Abbas
Hi Experts,
Cash Desk: Transaction Code FPCD
While printing the acknowledgement form,
One number range maintained and it is triggering at the time print form of cash desk.
Client wants different number according to Division.
Configuration level cannot able to maintain number ranges Division wise.
Number range maintained at this node:
SPRO-->Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable-->Business Transactions-->Processing Incoming and Outgoing Payments-->Receipt Management-->Maintain Number Ranges for Receipt Printing.
How to achieve this?
Thanks in Advance.
Hi Experts,
In the function module at event R402, so far I am able to create the new BP line item and new GL line item and append them to t_vkk_doc_id-vkk_doc_r402-n_fkkop and t_vkk_doc_id-vkk_doc_r402-n_fkkopk respectively. I am also able to populate some useful value in an empty field in the existing BP line items and modify t_vkk_doc_id-vkk_doc_r402-t_fkkop accordingly.
When the function module is executed, all data are created or populated successfully in t_vkk_doc_id-vkk_doc_r402. However, when posting happens, the new value that was populated in t_vkk_doc_id-vkk_doc_r402-t_fkkop was missing from the posted document, although the new BL line item and new GL line item were created successfully.
Is R402 used only for creating new line items? Where is the best place to modify the existing line items?
Thanks.
Jennifer
Hello Expert,
I have to do flat rate billing for one implementation project , I have configured main/sub transaction and also assigned it to internal main sub transaction .
corresponding entries have been maintained in EK02 and EK01 but when I am pressing F4 button in DST/CST , nothing is populated .
When I am entering sub transaction manually , getting different types of error . (For example -
The internal transaction 0051 is not assigned to an external transaction.
Sub-transaction 0020 does not exist in table TE305 for division 02 )
I am not able to understand what is missing here. Could you please provide your expertise .
Please find the screenshot attached herewith .
Any help will be highly appreciated .
Thanks & regards,
Gyanendra
Hi Experts,
We recently changed a particular statistical main/sub from "J" to "G" to account for revenue GL while receiving payment against those open items.
While clearing the new open items with statistical key "G" I am getting an error (>0854). We have Funds Management (FM) activated.
We applied SAP 1938530 - Statistical item cannot be cleared: >0 854 or >0 083to over come the problem but still getting further error (FKKFMCHK002) .
"Balance is not Zero, cannot make postings".
We did not get this error while clearing open items with statistical key "J" & "H".
Please advise how to overcome this error.
Thanks & Regards
Satyajeet Ghosh
Can anyone tell me how to Enhance the FQEVENTS in ISU.
i have one requirement like i need to achieve the Tax agreegate billing with out configuration changes. I need t oenhance the events that are tagged to the Billing and achieve this functionality.
Please help!!
Can anyone tell me how to Enhance the FQEVENTS in ISU.
i have one requirement like i need to achieve the Tax aggregate billing with out configuration changes. I need to enhance the events that are tagged to the Billing and achieve this functionality.
Please help!!
Hello Colleagues,
We're using BRF+ for IS-U Collections, and the users are asking how the following 2 fields can be used:
a) Collection Step Category
b) Collection Step Level
Any insights would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Kind regards,
Ivor Martin
Hello Everyone,
We are implementing import of CAMT.053 Bank Statement for incoming payment.
1) We did successfully XSLT Transformation and imported the data into FI Tables.
2) External Return Code FEBEP-KKREF was also stored in the table from the file.
3) When I read the Bank statement data, and create Return Lot through FPB7 transaction, Return Lot is created but the Return Code is lost somewhere though we have correctly configured the mapping of external codes from Bank to internal codes.
4) We debugged the Programm RFKKKA00, and found that in Include RFKIKA13 the House Bank code "p_bfkkrp_rlhbk" is always set as '0'.(See the attachment)
5) Due to this, System always try to look for a mapping of external reason code '0' instead of the return code 'AC01' in the statement and predictably it doesnt find anything.
I think setting the value '0' for House Bank return code is Wrong. Instead it should be mapped to "p_fkkbep-kkref".
Did this problem occur to you as well? Is there a solution for it? I dont see any SAP Note for this also.
Appreciate your suggestions.
Regards,
Prashant
Hello Expert ,
I am working on one implementation project , have completed basic configuration on Rate, Rate Category, Schema etc .
I have to do flat rate billing but when I am trying to do this , system asked to enter MRU but MRU will not be required for flat rate billing .
So, I have decided to do the manual billing through T-Code EA16 , now system responded with an error message .(Error for document type 05 is missing from table TE667 ). I am not sure what configuration is required in SPRO for this .
Could you please help me on this . Any help will be appreciated .
Is there any other way to do flat rate billing ( currently I am using variant LUMSUM01)?
Please find the screenshot attached herewith .
Thanks & regards,
Gyanendra
Hi,
Is there any standard solution to have individual FI document posting for each individual ISU invoice FI-CA document? Like, we have a Line Item (DFKKOPK-XEIPH) check box available in FP05 and FP25 in case of payment document. Same way is there any standard solution for Invoicing document created through EASIBI or EA10? So, that whenever, invoicing reconciliation key is posted in FI, it should create individual FI document against each corresponding FI-CA invoicing document irrespective of account assignment.
Thanks
Viraj.
Hi Experts,
As I'am new here in SAP world were in my profile is SAP ISU CRM as i recently got the job and have to join soon as a support consultant on SAP ISU CRM so can any one help me what exactly the issue which i can face as i have not worked on this profile
your help is really appreciated
Thanks in advance
Best Regards
Mohammed