Hi experts,
while posting a return item thru FP09 structure, description is showing as "Incoming Payments" instead of "Return" in Account Balance(FPL9).we are providing Contract Account while posting it thru FP09 structure.
Please suggest if there is any configuration change is required.
Thanks & Regards,
Radharaman Haldar
Hi,
Can anyone help me understand whether weighting key units or estimation logic written in user exit EXIT_SAPLELHR_003 is considered for meter reading estimation and how it works ?
Thanks in advance.
Arabinda Das
Hi All,
Anyone please let know if is there any function module or BAPI to update the field ABWBL in table DFKKOP.
I request you to please provide me solution in details means how to use the function module and what parameters in FM I
have to use.
Thank in advance.
Regards,
Arun Rajoriya
Hi Gurus,
Can you help with my billing problem during EASIBI?
I already done initial analysis but still failed.
Hi Experts,
Could you please provide your inputs to design below requirement?
We have two different contracts/installations on the premise with same meter assigned to it. First contract is assigned to tenant and second one is assigned to landlord of the premise. They have same billing cycle as well. They are billed together at the end of every month.
Both contracts include consumption and flat charges.
If the first tenant’s contract gets moved-out in between of the billing period, then charges on the second contract (Landlord) contract should be prorated based on No. of Active days of the Tenant's contract.
Example : Billing Cycle : 1st Jan to 31st Jan
Tenant moves out on 10th Jan then charges (consumption charges and flat charges) on Landlord for periodic billing on 1st Feb should be prorated based
on number of active days (10 days for this example).
Thanks in advance!
Helo SAP Experts,
It seems when new Contracts are creating in CRM, it fails in ECRMREPL & requires cancellation of FICA documents postings.
Is there an alternate/better way of successfully replicating these Contracts from CRM to ISU without having to cancel financial documents (e.g. Billing document, Invoice, Payment, Account docs etc.)?
Please advise.
Thanks.
Sumit Bhatia
Hello,
We have instances in our system where DFKKOP-ABWBL is getting populated with OPBEL (somehow). This is causing problem while transferring the related document to some other contract account.
We are now thinking of creating a report which would update DFKKOP-ABWBL for us. However, we cannt find a suitable BAPI/FM for this purpose. Does anyone have any previous experience on updating this field? Our last option would be to use UPDATE statement for this purpose.
Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks,
AM
Hi Experts,
We are using field 'Billing Lock' (EVERD-INVLOCKR) to block the invoice creation; this field is at contract level. And this field is displayed at contract change / display screen.
But this field is not coming on move-in contract screen (tcode EC50E).
I have seen configuration (SAP uitilites --> master data --> Utility contract --> Define field selection for utility contract) and found below 2 options for Screen group:
1: Screen modification in contract
2: IS-U Contract Fields in Move-In Transac.
Field "Billing Lock" is available only in 1st option but it is not there in 2nd option.
Kindly suggest how this field (Billing Lock) can be displayed at move-in screen (movein contract screen).
Regards,
Raju
Hi,
This is a requirement specific to our German client. They have a concept of post office bank account.
But we have less idea on how it have to work in SAP FSCD.
I learned from my colleague that this has to work same as check and should not maintain bank details in BP. I configured everything same as check and only one change is the 'Payment method classification' in FQP1 which I chose 'Post office bank account'. But without bank details in BP, FPY1 is giving message 'Bank details not maintained' and is not processing it. If we maintain bank details in BP there is no issue and it is processing.
During debugging FPY1 observed that if in FQP1 the processing type is selected as 'Bank account' it is expecting the bank details in BP. But in the config it is not allowing to select 'Internal clearing/deposit account' or 'Payment card' and is giving error 'Check/euro transfer/post bank and internal clearing cancel each other out'
So I changed the same to 'Internal clearing/deposit account' in the back end table in debugging and FPY1 is now giving message "Deposit account does not exist" and is going to exception.
I tried to put a clearing account in master data of contract account as per the note 167116. But still the same exception comes.
Please let me know if I am on the right track. Or is there some specific settings we have to do.
Thanks
Vinitha
Hello Experts,
This questions may have asked before but I couldn't find it anywhere so I had to ask again and sorry for the inconvenience.
My client has FPY1 for direct debits and its working fine, now they want to provide a functionality where customer can make over payments (via portal) so that it can be added to FPY1 run.
Ex: Customer's invoice is $100 , but pays $150 so they can use it in future.
or Customer has 0 balance but wants to make some payments so they can use it in future.
do we need to update FPY1 to include these over payments? or the program only looks for open items?
My solution was to add some fields in DFKKOP table for over payments, then FPY1 looks into the table to select these items., but I was thinking there should be a way we can update FPY1 to look for over payments.
Thanks,
Arvind
Hi guys,
i have a problem at FPCJ, i listed step by step what i do;
1. i made a payment
2. i closed cash desk, now cash desk has no money
3. i reopened cash desk
4. i run reversal for that payment
5. reversal document created
FP08 getting error if i try to use it for reverse that payment. Actually i want to see FPCJ is doing the same (OSS Note: 644870)
Note: in event 0070 several modules are working to check reversal and FKK_CJ_PROHIBIT_RVRSL does not check anything if i use FPCJ
Any idea?
Hi All,
Need experts advice which can help and guide us in solving the below issue as per the client requirement .
Is there a way to extract Meter reads data of 15 million records as delta from Delta queue in one go ?
We have a scenario where in SAP ISU every day meter reads data will be generated in millions (~20 million records per day ) for which we are using std SAP extractor 0UC_MTR_DOC .
In our every day delta jobs this particular data source is extracting 1 million records and getting completed but our business (client) is expecting all 20 million records to be extracted in daily delta and available for their daily business validation.
As per Std SAP , there is a default threshold value defined per delta extraction as 1 million records . which can also be changed by implementing a Note but with some performance implication's
We have Implemented NOTE :1505040 as per SAP and increased the parameter to 5 million records per extraction and it took 12 hrs to complete the extraction which is again not meeting our daily batch window .
Thanks,
Naveen
Hi,
I am getting above exception when I am try to correct bill from CRM WE UI. As soon as I click on "Create Bil" button, I get this error on screen.
The dump is coming while fething key of Print Doc from Object. There is no custom code involved.
Does anyone know how to fix this?
Hi!
I have a question:
Do you know if it posible fill the Period Consumption in transaction EG31 automatically?
In exit EXIT_SAPLE30D_001 in fill this field in XY_ZW_INPUT-PERVERBRO and PERVERBR, but the fill is empty:
Thanks!
Dear Colleagues,
Good morning,
in the resent past I read all the documentation about setting up an installtion group within SAP IS-U. What is necessary, what can it be used for and all these things.
Very good documentation. No doubt about it.
But in my case a little bit to complicated and for the reason I (respectively we as a Utility Company) want to use it for, much to complex.
Does anyone from you know a SAP Standard way in IS-U, with that a Serial switching
- main Installation -> Sub Installation or
- main Installation -> Sub Installation -> Sub installation
can be set up in SAP IS-U.
I do not Need any Special billing rules or something similar. Just a way to tell by looking on the Installation via Transaction ES32, that this is the main Installation and which Sub installations are belonging to it, or the other way around, by looking at the Sub Installation and know, which is the main Installation ?
Any help / is highly appreciated.
Thank you for your time.
Kind regards,
Manuel
Hello Experts,
We are getting difference amount in recon. key in FPT1 transaction code.
Recon. key closed and transferred successfully, but not sure why this error is populating,
Please help to understand why this difference in Amount in LC (BETRH) and Amount (BETRW)?
Screen shot attached for your reference.
Thanks,
Imtiyaz
Hi Experts,
We have activated FSCM in our system for FICA credit management integration. As per standard system, it will calculate the credit scores at business partner level.
So, I just want to know if in system, there is 1 BP - N CA relation. How it will work. Is there any option to consider credit score for CA rather than BP?
If not, how we can manage this scenario in credit management.
Scenario: 1BP is having multiple CA & 1 of them is having highly negative score & because of this other CA with good credit score may impact for their credit score. How to overcome this scenario.
Thanks,
SP
Hi ,
I am facing Issue while posting documents:
Posting document (Dialog):Lock in NRIV and performance problem during document number assignment.
Please help.
Regards,
Yatendra
Hi there,
We are using CRM FCC to process FICA write off.
And we have also implemented rules to abort or proceed the process. We are invoking the BRF+ rule from event 5008 and each rule has its own error message that we would want to show the user in UI.
Problem is, the standard FM FKK_CRM_ACCOUNT_WRITEOFF has not given any chance to capture the error message (T_FIMSG) from event 5008.
Has anyone faced this error and was able to tackle this using the standard FM?
Regards,
Bodhisattwa
Hi Folks,
I have a question related to SAP FICA for ISU. I am not a Finance person so please pardon me if the question sounds vague or stupid.
I want to know if it is possible to post a separate line for Tax to the contract account when an invoice is posted.
Currently, when an invoice is being posted a single FICA document is created for the total amount including Bill Charges and Taxes and have the common due date. Now, the customer wants to know if he can have different due dates for Energy Charges and VAT.
I believe, the first thing to achieve this would be posting a separate line for VAT on the account and the due date can be actioned with some customization.
So the first question is if it is possible to post separate lines, 1 for charges and 1 for VAT?
Secondly, if there is any standard configuration available to achieve this?
The SAP ISU FICA area is very new to me and I do not have much expertise in this area so any help and suggestions will be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.