Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Unanswered Discussions - SAP for Utilities
Viewing all 1891 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

BP Relationship Category duplicate

July 17, 2013, 8:00 am
$
0
0

Hello,

           I have a requirement where a duplicate Relationship category should be created for a BP Contact (BP in Contact Person - BP Role). A BP Contact sometimes is assigned dual roles in the company for the same active period/time.

 

For Example: BP 1 (MKK Role):                CompanyXYZ

                    BP 2 (Contact Person Role): PersonABC.

 

PersonABC is a Contact Person for CompanyXYZ. The relationship for this PersonABC is created by assigning the Relationship Category 'Is Contact Person For'  from 01/01/2013 to 05/01/2013. This PersonABC will have a Relationship Type (for ex.) Production Manager.

 

I need to create one more Relationship Category 'Is Contact Person For'  from 01/01/2013 to 05/01/2013 for the same BP CompanyXYZ but assign a different Relationship Type (for ex.) Funding Manager.

 

In short I need to duplicate a relationship category for a Contact Person who plays a dual role in a company.

 

I tried to do this but SAP stops me with an error "This Relationship already exists". Anyone knows of any event to modify this part? or has come across this problem and knows solution? Please advice.

 

Regards,

Praveen

↧
Search

Tax on Down payment

July 18, 2013, 7:09 am
$
0
0

hi dear gurus..

 

in my current Indian utility company wants to calculate service tax 12% on receiving down payments from cash desk 'FPCJ'. i tried with the following specification when amount is taken from customer as a advance through fpcj with a selection check box on account. when i am posting from fpcj system is not picking the tax amount it's only picking normal down payment with a combination os 0060 and 0010.

 

# i assigned tax codes at sub transaction level, i tested manually result working fine with 0060 and 0010

 

# is there any limitations for FPCJ to adding additional tax amounts ?

 

# can u give a exact functionality of a fpcj on this kind of process

 

 

thaks...

 

 

Ran    

 

Message was edited by: William Eastman

↧
↧

Automatic Reset Clearing During Invoice Reversal

July 18, 2013, 8:51 am
$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

I 've requirement to automatically perform reset clearing whenever invoicing reversal is done. Could you please tell me what config should be done for this? I tried to check "Invoicing Reversal" node under "Integration" in the "Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable" but somehow this config didn't work for me. May be I am missing dependent nodes. Can you please help. Let me know if there is any other way to do this automatic reset clearing. Thanks.

 

-

Kind Regards,

Nikhil J.

↧

CRM ISU replication Issue

July 19, 2013, 6:21 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We have one issue in data replication from ISU to CRM

In some premises when we changed the room number it does not changed in web ui.

Even for those premises we are not able to change room number in from web also As when we press save button

room number comes to old one.

 

In web we are using std component of premise.We have checked by BSP_WD_CMPWB.

Request you to look into it & help me.

 

 

Thanks

Roli

↧

ISU- Adjustment Reversal

July 20, 2013, 11:10 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I am trying to reverse a document 1001637 in EA21 but getting the following error

''''

Document 1001637 cannot be reversed for adjustment due to document 1001636

Message no. AH758

Diagnosis

Document 1001637 is to undergo a special reversal. Document 1001637 already represents the new billing of document 1001636, which was reversed for adjustment. It is not possible to link adjustment reversals by means of a renewed adjustment reversal.

Procedure

A normal reversal must be executed for document 1001637 - that is, an invoicing and billing reversal. If this is no longer possible, you can create a manual credit memo or backbilling.

''''

 

In table ERCH the document 1001636 is being shown as reversed.

Can somebody explain me what this error message means?

 

Thank you.

↧
↧

FM error during account maintenance (FP06) of statistical document with “payment on account”.

July 20, 2013, 11:18 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Note : FM Derive has been done for Revenue GL and also based on Main & sub. Using trace we are able to see the FMAREA, Fund center and Fund. In scenario - Real posting, it is posted without error. Statistical posting is also posted with error.

 

Scenario: However during account maintenance (FP06) of statistical document with “payment on account” , the below error is coming.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FM account assignment is missing from business partner line item

Message no. FKKFMCHK008

 

Diagnosis

You want to post a document that is recorded in Funds Management. To do this, you must assign an FM account assignment that contains at least the relevant company code (and therefore the corresponding FM Area in FM as well), a commitment item and a funds center.

 

In this document, the FM account assignment is incomplete.

 

System Response

The document cannot be posted.

 

Procedure

Complete the FM account assignment data and repeat the posting transaction.

 

please help

 

Regards

↧

Proration during rate determination

July 21, 2013, 1:20 am
$
0
0

Hello experts,

I am using rate determination change in order to use two different rate determination in single period.

My problem is for value that comes from operand of category QUANT.

The value does not get proration during rate determination.

Is that a product error? Is there a way to 'create' a proration for this operand?

I am using QUANTI07.

Thanks for help

Ben

↧

Transfer between contract accounts

July 22, 2013, 4:54 am
$
0
0

 

Hello,

 

I have a problem executing the transaction FP40

 

Initial situation:

3.- The business partner BP1 has two contract accounts: CA10 and CA20

1.- The contract account CA10 belongs to company code TR10 (FKKVKP-OPBUK = TR10 and FKKVKP-STDBK = TR10)

2.- The contract account CA20 belongs to company code TR20 (FKKVKP-OPBUK = TR20 and FKKVKP-STDBK = TR20)

4.- I have a posting (P1) which contract account is CA10 and the company code of the posting (BUKRS) is TR10

 

The problem is:

 

If I try to transfer the posting P1 with FP40 to the contract CA20, then I get the message "Input values do not match or exist"

That is because the posting P1 has the BUKRS = TR10 and the target contract account (CA20) belongs to TR20.

Because TR20 <> TR10, then I get the error.

 

My question is, why does SAP deliver such message?

The new postings must have the contract account CA20 and BUKRS = TR10.

I already have postings in SAP where the contract account is CA20 and the BUKRS is TR10

 

What do I do wrong?

 

Cheer and thanks in advance

Mar

↧
Search

SEPA info

July 19, 2013, 6:04 am
$
0
0

Hi experts,

i'm starting right now to study SEPA rules to set up the functionality in SAP ECC 6.06. I started to see the preliminary customizing for to do Direct Debit for an Italian company,  the correct Badi's to use and any correction to do on this Badi's in order to be compliant with the frim's needs.Can anybody help me to find some documentation for this job and in particular to be more able to face the most important problem that i could find to configure the SEPA in SAP? For example, can anyblody tell me where i define if a file generated with SEPA standard format SEPA_DD, is type FRST or RCURR???

 

Thank in advance

Besy regards

 

Giuseppe

↧
↧

Withholding Tax - DFKKOP-QBSHB -field not updated

July 22, 2013, 2:02 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

we have activated withholding tax on security deposit, the tax is getting calculated correctly both for the base document on which withholding tax is getting calculated is not getting updated completely.

 

In the document overview under tax section withholding tax base is updated properly with the tax rate but the withholding tax amount is showing as 0.00.

 

Please let me know if there is any note for this issue.

 

Regards,

Gaurav

↧

How to find the ISU version in SAP

July 22, 2013, 10:23 pm
$
0
0

Hi Exports,

 

Please guide, how to find the current ISU version in SAP?

 

Regards,

Sri...

↧

Allocation not poss.; Location of prof. vals of role and prof. different in EEDM04

July 23, 2013, 1:00 am
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

I am getting an message in the status bar stating "Allocation not poss.; Location of prof. vals of role and prof. different".

 

I have created a Profile in EEDM07 and now I am trying to assign an device and its register to the profile but I am getting this error.

 

Please help.

 

Regards,

Manoj

↧

Withholding tax process in FICA

July 23, 2013, 3:48 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We are calculating withholding tax on the security deposit interest. During release of the security deposit we are calculation the interest and the withholding tax. The tax is getting calculated as expected. Just wanted to understand if its SAP standard:

 

1. The interest and withholding tax both are posted with same document number.

2. suppose interest amount is 12.50GBP and the rate of 20% the withholding tax amount is 2.5GBP.

3. On the account balance I could see two line items of same for the document; one with amount 12.50GBP and another with 2.5GBP.

4. As per our clearing rule the 12.50(interest amount) is getting used for clearing the debit items. The other part of withholding tax is lying as debit item due to which it is getting used for the dunning.

 

Query -  The document created for interest and withholding tax same so the document should have just shown the net off amount? Please clarify?

 

Regards,

Gaurav

↧
↧

Unable to create account and parked document at one go

July 23, 2013, 2:05 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

In CRM Web IC under MoveInOut Premise, there is a functionality to create an account and perform a Move In and Out at one go. After I filled up the account details and pressed Create Account button, the system will create a new BP and replicates it over to IS-U. From SMW01, I can see that it is being replicated over. Then the system will generate a parked document by making some RFC calls to IS-U. When the system tries to generate the parked document, it is returning an error message sayings the newly created BP does not exists. At the point of creating the parked document, I am pretty sure the BP is already in IS-U.

 

Now here's the interesting part, I put a session breakpoint at the event handler for the Create Account button and repeated what I described above. When I hit the Create Account button, the debugger popped out. I pressed F8 for it to continue and from this point onward, everything is working fine. The BP is created and replicated; and the parked document is created without any issue.

 

I thought this might be some latency issue between CRM and IS-U and added a WAIT statement in the event handler but it is still not working. Right now, the only way it will works is by putting a breakpoint. Any idea why?

 

For those who are interested in having a look at the component, here are the details:

  • Component: IUICMIO_MAIN
  • View: SearchPartner
  • Event handler: EH_ONCREATE (line 9 - 10)

 

Regards,

TM

↧

Posting not permitted; business transaction not recognized Message no. FKKFMCHK018

July 23, 2013, 10:19 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We are using Debit Position of Statistical Item in Invoicing.

 

Relevant main and sub transaction and related configuration in FICA and Invoicing have been done.

   

When invoicing is performed the following error is coming:-

================

Posting not permitted; business transaction not recognized

Message no. FKKFMCHK018

 

 

Diagnosis

You have posted a document that in Funds Management only has commitment items with financial transaction 60 but has no

cleared item. The system cannot classify such postings by business transction. Therefore, these postings are not permitted.

 

 

 

 

Procedure

Change the way you post the business transaction

==================

 

 

Kindly assist.

↧
Search

Check if bp bank change is allowed

July 24, 2013, 3:44 am
$
0
0

Hello all,


I was wondering if it is possible to perform additional checks when a bank account is changed (in transaction BP, tab "payment transaction").

So for example when there is still an outgoing document (with that account number on it) that needs to be paid to the business partner that you will get an error that it is not allowed to change the bank account. And that the bank account changes cannot be done / saved / reversed.


Is this something that can be done in standard SAP, if not what would be the best place to add this kind of logic?


Thanks a lot,

Lukas Molenaar

↧

Partial payment restriction

July 24, 2013, 8:19 am
$
0
0

Hey gurus,

 

Is it possible to set a temporal partial payment restriction over FICA documents?

 

Jing.

↧
↧

Advance payment interest calculation

July 24, 2013, 11:56 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

        We need to implement advance payment from customer functionality , for that we have planned to put advance payments made by customer as on account payments , which will get cleared (allocated) to bill generated for customer at later dates. But we have to calculate interest on the payment amount every six months . for that we have updated an interest key to the payments made by customer . now when we calculate interest on the payment only payment amount (Credit) which is open on the day of interest calculation , interest is calculated . but the item which has been cleared is not available for interest calculation . we are using FPI1 and FPINTM1 to calculate interest . Is there any way we can calculate interest on the cleared amount.

 

 

Example --

 

On-account payment - 1000  on 01.04.2013

 

partial clearing on 15.04.2013 with bill .

 

item-1--On-account payment - 700   (Open)

item-2--On-account payment - 300   (cleared)

 

currently system calculates interest on item 1

 

item-1--On-account payment - 700   (Open)  

 

what we need

interest calculation on

On-account payment - 1000  till 01.04.2013----15.04.2013 (because the item was open till this date )

On-account payment--  700        16.05.2013-- till interest run date (because its still open )

 

Is this functionality achievable using the FPI1 or FPINTM1

 

p.s

 

1) In the define interest key we have selected -- consider all items for interest calculation

2) In FPI1 we have selected option credit item and all items in interest parameters.

↧

Scheduling job with dynamic start condition

July 25, 2013, 4:47 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have the following jobs which are running automatically everyday.

 

1. Automatic clearing runs automatically everyday at 21:30. This is scheduled using job container. The name of the job getting executed(From SM37)

FKJOCRE__MA00000120130724213000 .

 

Here the container name is MA000001+Date(YYYYDDMM)+TIME(HHMMSS).

 

2. There is another job for the Activation of the installments, whihc takes place at 21:45 everyday. This is defined using SM36 and with ABAP program in the background.

 

I wanted to establish a dependency between these 2 jobs.

 

Activation of the installments should work only after the execution of Automatic clearing(defined usig jobcontainer FKJOXTR)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

afterjob.gif

 

In SM36 from start conditions, I can define the dependency. But here my job name is dynamic as explained above with date and time. How can I define, here?

 

For ex:- Today dated 25.07.2013, Installment plan reactivation should happen only after the execution of the job,

 

FKJOCRE__MA00000120130725213000 and tomorrow the job would be with the name FKJOCRE__MA00000120130726213000.

 

How to acheive this?

 

Thanks in advance!

Lakshmi

↧

Single Email for Multiple Invoice documents - FPCOPARA

July 26, 2013, 12:19 pm
$
0
0

Hi Viewers,

 

I am having the requirement to send a single email with multiple invoice attachments for a customer using FPCOPARA.

 

Currently, It's triggering multiple emails for a single customer based on the invoice document. Because, I could see separate line items for each invoice document in DFKKCOH table.

 

I would like to know any events or configuration settings to achieve this requirement.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Best Regards,

Rajaram A

↧
Viewing all 1891 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>