Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Unanswered Discussions - SAP for Utilities
Viewing all 1891 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Change of portion

August 26, 2013, 10:27 am
$
0
0

Hello.

 

Could you help me, please? I want to change portion  and  Meter Reading Units for installation. Origin portion and MRU had end billing period to 18. day of the month. New portion and MRU will set end billing period to 31.12.  What is the better way to change it? In which time is better to insert time slice for new MRU and how can I adjus BB plan for new portion? Because I invoiced account to 18.6.2013. Then I set new portion and MRU on installation to end billing period 31.12. But I had problem adjust BB plan to end biiling period 31.12.

 

Thank you very much for your answer.

 

With regards

 

Inga

↧
Search

EDM profile not in change mode after billing document is reversed.

August 26, 2013, 12:05 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

After reversing bill document status of profile is still IU018 (locked for edit).

I am unable to modify the profile.

Have you seen this happening?

 

Thanks,

Tanmay

↧
↧

MAINTAIN USER PROFILE

August 26, 2013, 4:25 pm
$
0
0

Hello everybody,

 

I am trying to set up a default value using SU3:

 

I entered parameter ID GSB 000P Business Area and

             parameter ID KML 25 CSP contract account

 

I saved and log off of SAP and logged in again and it did not save the defaults entered.  I also tried without logging off and still did not save the changes any idea what I am doing wrong? I tried with KTP  CSP Contract account and it worked.

 

Thanks in advance for your assistance

 

Valentina Solorzano

↧

inbound idoc status 51 even if everything seems correct

August 27, 2013, 2:40 am
$
0
0

Hello all,

For system Q7G in profile allocation data exchange, the outbound idoc in client 940 shows status 3 while the corresponding inbound idoc in client 945 shows status 51 and it says 'IDoc from category UTILMD was not processed'.And the data in the inbound idoc looks correct. The function module, message type and basic type,  partner profiles are also correctly maintained. Port are also maintained in both the systems.

And when I go to we19 and give the same function module there to process the inbound idoc, it says "interface for the function module is not correct" 

Could anyone please suggest the solution for this issue?

Thanks and best regards,

Akshay Kumar

↧

i am using BAPI_ISUMOVEIN_CREATEFROMDATA, i am getting certain errors.

August 27, 2013, 5:05 am
$
0
0

hi i am an abaper, i am using the bapi to create move in . there are some errors i am facing which technically i an unable to get it.

 

1. No number range found for object ISU_EEIN

2. Error occurred reading the data for move-in document 000000000760 in SAPLEC50 OPEN_DOCUMENTS

 

i am not an ISU consultant so needs to your help regarding that

 

regards

 

Abhishek

↧
↧

Standing Requests Posting error due to closed posting periods

August 27, 2013, 7:54 am
$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

We are using Standing request FKKORD2 for posting a specific charge . Sometimes Standing request start date is required for the future period going beyond the open posting periods. This is creating posting period errors. The issue is Posting periods cant be made to open for so long in future.Please suggest if any one has faced similar issue and its resolution.

 

Thanks

Sandeep

↧

Optical Archiving

August 27, 2013, 7:47 pm
$
0
0

Hello,

 

I want to save the invoice to PDF file, when the FPCOPARA is executed for corresponcdance type 0042.

EFRM is configured and the setting is to print and archive.

 

When the Bill Simulation is executed to print, I am using output device as ZPDF.

 

I was expecting to save the Invoice PDF but getting the message that Optical Archiving is not enabled.

 

Any clue as to how do I configure this?

↧

Dunning for some open items is not triggering

August 28, 2013, 1:14 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Industry:- Retail Industry, Online shopping

 

I have a business requirement in which a Contract account should have only one dunning level irrespective of the number of orders and their respective due dates. This is customized using event 300 and..This is the present setup of the system and is working as desired.

 

 

test.gif

Please see the screenshot above,

 

Now I have a scenario,

 

for the order 201831536 dunning level 21 is reached. The dunning run has occured on 15.07.2013 and at that time, order 202051809 has n't reached its due date. Mean while customer has made the payment for the order 201831536.

 

But with the next dunning run, this order 202051809 has n't been dunned anymore, eventhough its due date is crossed. Do i need to check in some events?

 

Thanks in advance!

Lakshmi.

↧
Search

Transaction FKKCLERK_CM_CUCENTER

August 28, 2013, 7:03 am
$
0
0

Hi Xperts,

 

Are transactions:

FKKCLERK_CM_CUCENTER - Maintain Department Responsibilities

FKKCLERK_CM_CUUNIT - Maintain Unit Responsibilities

FKKCLERK_CM_CUAGENT - Maintain Collection Specialist Responsibilities

 

Meant for a workflow administrator role, or for the collection manager?

 

Thanks,

 

Jing C.

↧
↧

Payment Lot from Paypal is incomplete

August 29, 2013, 5:38 am
$
0
0

Dear Friends,

 

Payment Lot from Paypal was recived and it is incomplete. It can neither be closed nor posted.

 

Why is the Payment Lot incomplete? I mean is there any inconsistency in the data which resulted in status incomplete?

 

I have referred to the thread http://scn.sap.com/thread/1179182

Here the payment lots are from cash desk.

 

Can you please help me how to verify the data?

How to close and post the data?

 

Thanks in advance!

Lakshmi.

↧

Update template Run ID with new Simrunid using a program

August 30, 2013, 2:20 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We use four steps to simulate bill for a given period.

 

1. Create Simulation Period       - EAMS20 u2013

2. Run Indexing          - EAMS10 u2013

3. Change Sim Period     - EAMS20 u2013 change status from 0 to 1

4. Set parallel process           - EAMS01 u2013 set the current simulation period in the template.      

  Based on FPSCHEDULER for BIBP Mass Activity.

 

since we want to automate above steps, we want to achieve step 4 in a program. that is change the simulation ID of template using a program.

 

could you please suggest.

 

Anjan

↧

Problem with new Stat sub transaction

August 31, 2013, 12:24 am
$
0
0

Hi Team,

 

i have created a new Stat miscellaneous debit sub-transaction and completed all settings including FQZB. and i have posted the manual transaction through FPE1.

 

actually as per our process if there is any stat open item it will adjusted in current bill by doing account clearing automatically and it will show in Bill form.

 

but for this new stat sub transaction is not showing in bill and not happening account clearing also. please advise how to find out the problem.

 

note: i have checked with existing main/sub and posted the manual posting and generate the bill. for those transactions are performing well.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Regards,

Srinivas

↧

Update Register Group of a device with Rate Type and Fact Group (Single FM)

August 31, 2013, 9:41 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have a requirement to update the Register Group of an installed device. The new Register Group has more number of registers than the earlier one.

 

So, while updating the Register Group (EG41), I have to update the Rate Type and Fact Group of the Registers in the new Register Group.

 

To update the Register Group I have the FM ISU_S_DEVICEMOD_CHANGE but this FM does not have Rate Type or Fact Group fields in the parameters.

 

I tried debugging EG41 transaction and found an FM ISU_O_DEVICEMOD_ACTION that creates new Logical Register Numbers at runtime for the new created Register as per the new Register Group. The logic that this FM is using is quite complicated and I am not sure whether using the same logic is safe or not.

 

I digged so many threads but didnt find the way to update Register Group along with Rate Type and Fact group through a single FM.

 

Please help, Moderator note - comment removed due to violation

 

Thanks,

Manoj

 

Message was edited by: William Eastman

↧
↧

Date getting changed while releasing outsorted invoice

September 1, 2013, 11:31 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am facing strange issue at my client system. When the invoicing job runs, some invoices are getting outsorted and user has to go to EA05 to release the documents. While releasing document, user gets a pop up with date and without changing date, user is releasing the document. After releasing, the invoice doesn't has the same document date and it gets changed to next working date. E.g, Lets say invoice outsort document date is 19/09/2010 and when user releases it, the document date is getting changed to 20/09/2010. Although, user has confirmed that they are not changing date, but it is getting changed by system. Need some input as;  How it is possible, that while releasing outsorted invoice document, the Document date is getting changed by system?? Please provide some inputs if anyone has info about this... Thanks

↧

Cash desk/cash journal payment posting

September 2, 2013, 2:11 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

In cash desk (FPCD/FPCJ) is it possible prevent the payments to post to CA until cash/cheque lots are closed using cash desk closing ?

 

We have a requirement that all cash desk payments get posted only when cash desk is closed for the day.

 

Thanks & Regards

Satyajeet

↧
Search

Payment Method is not changing from L to R

September 4, 2013, 6:54 am
$
0
0

Hi Friends,

 

Direct debit process for my client:-

 

BP's with payment method L(Lastschrift/Direct debit)

Payment Run is scheduled as job which gets executed everyday. In case of Return lot, payment method for that order needs to be changed from L to R.

 

This is all working as expected before the upgrade project. Due to SEPA implemetation, SAP upgrade project went on. After the upgrade project, this functionality is not working.

 

can you guys help me, how to proceed further OR where to look for? WIll there be any patch?

 

Thanks for ur time!

Lakshmi.

↧

Work item assignment and org. structure

September 5, 2013, 12:17 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

For the work item assignment SAP provides the standard task, and the rules (responsibilities assigned to them):

TS21000273 FI-CA Collections Department

TS21000274 FI-CA Collection Unit

TS21000269 FI-CA Collection Specialist

 

Which are then assigned to the org structure.

 

Are this business rules evaluated in a hierarchical manner?

For example, if I have one collection department (TS21000273), 2 collection group (TS21000274), 6 collection sub-groups (TS21000274), and then collection specialists will they be evaluated sequentially? Now my system seems to be evaluating only the rule assigned at the collection specialist standard task.

If the purpose is to build an organizational structure, then it should be possible to first evaluate the rule of the department, then evaluate the rules for the different collection group and sub groups TS21000274 and finally the rules assigned to the agents (collection specialists), right?.

 

Thanks to all.

 

Mario

↧
↧

Process to be done between FPVA and FPVB

September 5, 2013, 4:51 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

As we know, SAP - ISU consists two transactions.

 

FPVA - Dunning Proposals

FPVB - Dunning Activity

 

I want to know once FPVA is run, how to exclude multiple items from being passed to FPVB. Will this be custom program or SAP has provided any functionality for this?

 

From help.sap.com, I could find below related information:

 

The dunning proposal run proposes a reconciliation key for the documents posted during dunning. You can change this proposal manually. The dunning activity run only uses this reconciliation key if the run ID agrees with that of the dunning proposal run.

 

So where proposal can be changed manually?

 

Once FPVA is completed, FPM3 shows dunning line items but it can not be decided that dunning activities are also performed. Is there any way to make sure in FPM3 that dunning activities are also carried out?

 

Thanks,

Murtuza

↧

FPY1: Two first the same mandate on one XML file

September 5, 2013, 7:08 am
$
0
0

Hi experts,

 

Actually, I process a payment with one madate having one CA with 5 open items.

1 open item with due date 11.05.2013

4 open items with due date 22.08.2013

 

In the DMEE XMl (pain 008.001.02) file generated, I get two FRST's for the same mandate meanwhile I expected one FRST.

 

The first FRST has 10/09/2013 as collection date.

The second FRST has 07/09/2013 as collection date.

 

can you help to sort this out why I'm getting two FRST in the payment file.

 

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Bassamba Diallo

↧

do not dun

September 5, 2013, 12:03 pm
$
0
0

Charges for one account are marked as “Do Not Dun” and  can somebody figure out why.  Thanks.

↧
Viewing all 1891 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>