Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Unanswered Discussions - SAP for Utilities
Viewing all 1891 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

SEPA FIRST: Event 601, select only first docmeunt per mandate

September 6, 2013, 5:53 am
$
0
0

Hi Expert,

 

When I'm running FIRST transaction I can exlud Item in the event 601 by doing:  t_0601-xaktp_0601 = ' '

 

But in this event you have only one transaction at a time.


When I process the first document, I get hist BP and the corresponding mandate too.

When I process the second, i would like to check if this current doc has alrady been processed for the same mandate.

 

Situation is: event 601 is called for every document, so the variables where I store documents and corresponding BP & Mandates are lost.

 

How can I trace what are the mandates already processed ?

 

Thanks in advance,

 

thierno

↧
Search

Issue : Error message False call to FKK_RESET_CLEARING while calling a method to reverse the bill docs in a workflow.

September 8, 2013, 7:51 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I am facing an issue while calling a method to reverse the final bills/invoices and then reset clear the documents in SAP ISU ECC 6.0.

This method is being called from a reverse move out workflow as the customer payments made during move out as final bill need to be reversed and the rest clearings need to be done.

But the method gives the below mentioned error and the workflow goes into error.

 

The error says :

Message >0188 - Internal error: False call for FKK_RESET_CLEARING

Diagnosis
The function module FKK_RESET_CLEARING was called up for documentV1. however, this type of call is not permitted for one of thefollowing reasons:
 

  • The parameter I_PARTIAL (partial clearing reset) is not set.
  • Partial resets had already been posted for document &V1& so that every

        further clearing reset can also only be a partial one.

  • Parameter I_PARTIAL is set, but the corresponding table

        T_ACTIV does not contain any valid entries.

 

But the above issues are addressed in the code(screenshots attached)

The catchy part is once we restart the workflow , it gets executed successfully without any error.

Could anyone please guide me as to why the error is occurring  in the first instance.

 

Please let me know if you need any more info.

Appreciate your help in this regard !!

 

Best Regards,

Java

↧
↧

Unbilled case

September 9, 2013, 9:27 am
$
0
0

One account creates unbilled cases every month even though the customer has already been billed. Does somebody know what possible reasons cause this happens? Thanks.

↧

Synthetic profiles with dual rate register

September 10, 2013, 7:37 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Our requirement is the following:

 

We want to apply a synthetic profile to an installation that carries a dual rate register (high-peak/low-peak).

 

As far as we understand, the standard only allow to determine A SINGLE Usage factor for the total consumption of the installation (provided throught QUANTI24): Usage factor = TOTAL consumption (billed) / TOTAL consumption (synthetic profile)

 

From our point of view, we would need one usage factor per register, in order to allocate the high-peak/low-peak consumption to the corresponding periods.

 

The synthetic profile would therefore be applied to the consumptions provided by the two registers according to high/low periods defined by the "Day profiles" defined on the "Sythetic profile".

 

Thanks a lot for your help.

Sebastien

↧

Outstanding amount after disconnection

September 11, 2013, 5:27 am
$
0
0

Hello All,

 

I have a requirement to identify outstanding amount after disconnection due to non-payment.

 

Kindly help me.

 

 

Thanks & Regards,

Vijay

↧
↧

DMEE – EndToEndId with paymantorder

September 11, 2013, 7:07 am
$
0
0

Hello everyone,

 

I have question about a SEPA implementation. In the XML file, the CT pain001, is measured the  following field in the ‘PmtID’, InstrID, this field is filled with the  Payment order’ number from the table ‘PYORDH’ . The field below in the XML is the ‘EndToEndId’. This field contains, now, the last six positions of the ‘Payment order’ from the table ‘PYORD’.

 

When I get the MT940 back from the bank (RBS) then I aspect to clear on this number that is measured in tag 86 from the MT940. However the tag86 contains only the six last positions as mentioned in the XML file in the ‘EndToEndId’ field.

 

Does anyone know how I get the ‘payment order’ number into the ‘EndToEndId’ field? So finally automatic clearing will be effected.

 

I have found the following in the tcode DMEE:

 

DMEE.JPG

Thank you in advance

Henk Lamain

↧

EL30 - Only showing open meter reading orders

September 11, 2013, 11:09 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

 

I have a query regarding EL30. My clients wants the option of estimating all implausible MRs at one instance rather clicking estimate repeatedly (as in case of EL27) . However in EL30 I am only given the option to estimate the open meter reading orders. It is not showing me the implausible one. Please let me know if I have missed any configuration. Also if any alternate transaction would cater my requirement

 

Moderator note - comment removed

 

 

 

Thanks,Madhurima.

 

Message was edited by: William Eastman

↧

FICA : Wrong TAX code determination in Final Billing

September 12, 2013, 4:02 am
$
0
0

Dear All,

In our company we are facing a problem during vat code determination of period end/ final Invoicing.

 

Due to regulatory requirements it was required to introduce a new VAT code (X1)for the Grid Company cost. With Validity from date as 01/08/2013 , in IMG ; Code for Tax Code Determination. Before that we were having the VAT code(Y1) for the same.

 

We have Partial Billing Procedure for BBP .The Budget Bill invoice request for the month of July was created on 17/07/20013 & having the due date of 01/08/2013.

 

When we check the FICA document for the invoiced July budget invoice document, the amount is posted against the expected VAT code Y1. (because the Budget bill posting happened in July where the Y1 tax code was applicable)

 

Now the customer had his final/Period end invoice posted on 01/08/2013.

 

When we checked the invoice in FICA document overview, we see that the BBP amount was adjusted against VAT code X1 instead of the expected Y1. (because the Budget bill posting happened in July where the Y1 tax code was applicable & even the BB invoice was created with Y1)

 

The strange part is, tax determination code of the Budget bill gets changed after period end invoicing. Even though BB was initially invoiced with different tax code.

 

Kindly let us know if this is a strange behaviour & expected functionality.

↧
Search

SAP Electronic Bank Statement Configuration in FICA - FSCD

September 12, 2013, 1:46 pm
$
0
0

Hi, I am well aware of SAP EBS configuration in FICO. But I am required to do it in a FSCD now.

Could you please let me know the additional steps to configure and upload the electronic bank statement in FSCD.

If the check lots are not maintained in SAP FICO, how does the EBS post check clearing entries?

↧
↧

select from EANL

September 13, 2013, 9:57 am
$
0
0

Hello Experts,
Can you write the two queries into one. I want to avoid  hitting EANL twice.


I need to pull all the installations from EANL for a given premise. But at this point i dont have premise, but i have installation only.

i have anlage in lv_install.

 

1)select single vstelle into lv_prem from EANL where anlage = lv_install.

 

2) select anlage anlart into table it_eanl where vstelle = lv_prem (from 1 above)

 

pls suggest

↧

FPMA not working

September 15, 2013, 5:42 am
$
0
0

Hello Experts,

 

As part of a new requirement, we have enhanced the Clearing of certain accounts using Event 110 .

After the enhancement, FP06 is working fine but FPMA is unable to display the Write Off Tolerances leading to error.

 

Any suggestions please?

 

Thanks,

Aneesha.

↧

Posting area R001 for Payment on account

September 15, 2013, 3:27 pm
$
0
0

Hi, Experts!

 

I am trying to do Payment on account (in tcode FP05 for an item click buttons: Clarify Payment -> Post online -> On Account).

Error message appears: "Account determination not possible for key LE21  /      /01    /0060 /0010, posting area R001".

In my opinion:

- in Posting area R000 I define G/L account for Down payment (credit posting, amount with tax)

- in Posting area 0010 - G/L account for Tax on Sales (credit posting, tax)

  - in Posting area 0020 - G/L account for Offset tax (debit posting, tax)

  - also post (debit) on Bank account (amount with tax).

 

Why does Posting area R001 need?

If for tax determination, else which role does G/L account from this Posting area have?

 

 

Thanks in advance,

Dmitriy.

↧

Tolerance Limit check for a monthly portion

September 16, 2013, 1:03 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

My client requirement is as follows :

 

Monthly Portion, hence period length = 1 month

Tolerance limit should be checked based on last 12 periods. It will be relative tolerance check.

 

However in SAP maximum comparison period is 9. Can anyone suggest a solution which can be met by configuration?

 

Waiting for an early response.

Thanks,

Madhurima

↧
↧

Automatic Bar code and Credit Card info interpretation in FPCJ (Cash Journal)

September 16, 2013, 1:30 am
$
0
0

Hello everyone,

 

We are trying to implement IS-U FI-CA module for a gas distribution company. There are  requirements to interpret credit card information from electronic card reader to credit card details tab in Cash journal (FPCJ),  also bar code information from electronic bar code reader.

 

As you know there are some standard events in FQEVENTS transaction code like 6060,6065. Anybody can explain us how we can handle this requirements by using these events.

 

Thanks in advance.

↧

UCES Anonymous Move-In

September 16, 2013, 9:37 am
$
0
0

Hi there,

 

Our customer need to allow their costumers reports a move-in when the customer is a new user and not has credentials to log on. I have read about this and it is supposed that the new user could access to the move-in service directly using the jsp jsp/isuExtensions/direct_logon_html.jsp. I have set the dummyUserMoveIn parameter at XCM with the same value used at  direct_logon_html.jsp (ESERVICE).

 

The problem is when try to access to http://%3cserver%3e%3cport%3ehttp://<server>:<port>/bdisu/jsp/isuextensions/direct_logon_html.jsphttp://nullthe server requests the credentials to log into the server.

 

Is necessary to do any other configuration?

 

 

Thanks in advance,

Kind regards,

 

Jordi.

↧
Search

Questions related to Dunning Procedure Change

September 16, 2013, 11:51 am
$
0
0

Hi Expert,

 

We currently have four dunning levels in one dunning procedure.  I am requested to remove the 3rd level, which is to generate a list for the external system to initiate IVR call.  What will be the implication on the dunning history and future dunning if I remove the current 3rd dunning level?  Can I renumber the current 4th dunning level, which is to generate a disconnection approval list and call event 360 to create notification, to 3rd dunning level, or should I keep the 4th number as is, without the 3rd level in place?  In addition to that, I am also requested to create a new dunning level after the current 4rd level.  This new dunning level will not be triggered by the number of days in arrears.  Instead, it needs to be triggered by the completion status of particular task of the notification generated at the current 4th dunning level.  Can I create this new dunning level by configuration?  It seems that the dunning level by configuration is only driven by the days in arrears.  If I need to use a event, which event will be used?  Do I still need to create a new dunning level through configuration?  If so, how do I connect the configured dunning level with the event?

 

Thank you very much for your time to answer my email.  Please let me know if you need any clarification.

 

Jennifer

↧

CIC not supported in ECC

September 18, 2013, 2:10 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

Would anyone know where I could possibly find a formal publication on when the  CIC in ERP is going out of maintenance?

 

I’ve seen the following links on SDN:

http://scn.sap.com/thread/963632 where it is mentioned “Just to let you know SAP may end support to CIC within ECC soon”

 

Found a note but it’s only applicable to CRM. I have not been able to find any specific release notes on this topic for ERP, unless I missed something.

Note 1330349 - ISUCRM: Transactions CRMD_ORDER and CIC0 no longer supported

 

I’ve also been filtering through the Product Availability Matrix and I'm not hitting any luck.

 

Can anyone assist with this information?

 

Regards,

Reg

↧
↧

Enhance search results in CIC0

September 18, 2013, 7:01 am
$
0
0

Hello all,

 

When you search for a business partner in CIC0 (using ISUFINDER) and multiple results are found, a small dialog is shown.

This shows the possible results with the partner number and a short description. This short description is the ROLEICONSHORTTEXT attribute from business object ISUPARTNER.

 

 

Does anyone know if it's possible to change how the data is shown in this dialog? Can I for instance use a different attribute of the business object?

 

Kind regards,

Dieter

↧

EASIM _ Simulation scenario Doubt

September 19, 2013, 3:53 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

I am doing rate category comparison using EASIM (Simulation scenario) functionality and maintained required configuration for alternative rate category.

 

If I maintained the meter reading (using El28) for next billing period and trying to run simulation for same period (start bill period and end bill period on EASIM screen)system is giving information message “Enter valid meter reading” and not allowing to simulate.

 

But whereas if there is no meter reading entered for next bill period, system is simulating bill correctly

 

Also If I change MR in meter reading tab page , it is also not working.

 

 

Am I missing something?

 

 

Using below Config:

Simulation Scen. Category: Simulation Period with Rate Category Comparison and alternative rate categories are maintained.

 

Thanks in advance,

Chetan

↧

Error in Integration with FICA and Sales and Distribution

September 19, 2013, 4:22 am
$
0
0

Hello All,

 

We have implemented the SD-FICA integration and are posting a charge. This charge is been split into two line items with the help of a function module. one of the charge is a component of VAT.

The psoting is happening correctly, but while calculating interest through FPi1  and while transfering reconciliaiton key we are facing the error

Tax code A3 country IN does not exist in procedure TAXINN.

 

Not understanding where the setting is missing.

Tried all FTXP, FV11, OBQ1.

 

Still the error is not going. Has anyone faced this issue before.

 

Please anybody could help in this matter.

 

Regards

Charvi

↧
Viewing all 1891 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>